Skip to content

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2

Kimi K3 and GLM-5.2 are the two leading open-weights models. K3 scores seven Intelligence Index points higher (60 vs 53) but costs twice as much hosted ($3/$15 vs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens) and is far heavier to self-host: 2.8T total parameters against GLM's 753B. GLM-5.2 also generates over three times faster.

Side by side

Kimi K3GLM-5.2
MakerMoonshot AIZ AI
Released2026-07-162026-06-16
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Modalities intext, imagetext
Input $/MTok$3$1.4
Output $/MTok$15$4.4
Open weightsYes (Kimi K3 License (commercial terms apply))Yes (Open weights)

Prices as of ; sources on each model page.

Benchmark deltas

BenchmarkKimi K3GLM-5.2Δ
AA Intelligence Index6053+7

Δ is Kimi K3 minus GLM-5.2, in points. Shaded cell wins the row. Dashed values are vendor-published, not yet reproduced — methodology.

Cost calculator

Kimi K3
$300/mo
GLM-5.2
$114/mo
Difference
$186/mo

List prices as of 2026-08-11; excludes caching, batch, and long-context tiers — see model pages for tier notes.

Verdict

K3 is the capability champion of open weights; GLM-5.2 is the operability champion. Seven Intelligence Index points is a real gap — K3 sits with the closed frontier while GLM plays a tier below — but GLM-5.2's 40B active parameters, 142 tokens-per-second serving speed, and friendlier footprint make it the model more teams can actually run. Hosted, GLM costs under a third as much. Choose K3 when peak reasoning justifies the bill and the hardware; choose GLM-5.2 for self-hosted production at scale.

Verdicts are analysis, not measurement, and are labeled as such per our editorial policy.

FAQ

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than GLM-5.2?
No. GLM-5.2 is cheaper: $1.4 input / $4.4 output per million tokens against $3 / $15 for Kimi K3 (prices as of August 11, 2026).
Which has the longer context window — Kimi K3 or GLM-5.2?
Kimi K3 does — 1M tokens against 1M for GLM-5.2.
Which is the more capable model, Kimi K3 or GLM-5.2?
Kimi K3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 60 (measured August 11, 2026) against 53 for GLM-5.2 (measured August 11, 2026).

Related news

Comparison published August 11, 2026; underlying data last changed August 11, 2026.